Rigging Laser Sailboat

The never ending creative right
Susana Rinaldi.
represented the Argentina Association of Interpreters at the WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) . That was the only organization in Argentina in the place. Like her, he says that is sung whenever you have something to say.
By Jorge Belaunzarán

was having a full belly that allowed man to pursue art. Then why things ever made for love art? Even the most abstract creation has its materiality, that which you so upset sometimes deal. And that's why most of the time, is delegated. From cleaning the home to go shopping, to defend their own rights. True that the modern world sometimes prevented from doing all that is owed. But each era had its challenges. And, at least in large part, men of every one of them managed to overcome them.

"Here there is no knowledge in relation to intellectual property. It is a subject that sits above the head while outside of us, our country, make contacts, there are large institutions working on it. I think it also unequivocally, we are the only entity AADI (Asociación Argentina de Intérpretes), which are in contact with strong institutions, not only with the Ibero Latin American Federation. And if we had a wider knowledge of the subject would have a stronger participation. Even in the nation.

-At the meeting in Geneva to discuss the Rights of the Interpreter organized by WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization), what is the point that most will try?

"Our basic concern is that music is a common good that he represents the country with a high foreign exchange inflows. And most of these currencies are in private hands, through ignorance and carelessness. What is the relationship that the artist, performing musician, has on their rights and why there are creative rights? There is no tax. Always taken as a tax you want to add per se to institutions like ours, they are collecting or collecting. It does not happen there. Is because the creative right never ends. One can establish as law anywhere in the world. And here we do not know that.

- How would it be?

"Many things are happening, and well, with the music of Argentina outside the home. But we have no knowledge of the right support to say how far this will take some international writers sometimes make them sign contracts to artists apart from their right fit. And as the artist does not know what the law is that it is, because artists are actually pretty sloppy about it and we do not internalize enough, then speak ill of the causes and effects. But due to ignorance. Just as we did in the World Heritage, Unesco confuse international recorder because it gave us patriotism that way.

- Refers to tango?

"Sure, he was named a world heritage site as the pyramids of Egypt, such as jazz, and well. And it means that it can not be outraged by any private right to arrogate to this topic.

- What would a case of these rights of performers?

"We charge by diffusion in any form. What I'm asking is that the interpreter internalize what it means the right creative. And from there it is unified in the ongoing struggle for all concerned to diffusion. The dissemination of the music of Argentina is something quite deformed. These are rights which usually pass on some general music and charge are not our rights away. If we had more widely than if we had an approach and this is not is to impose that the music of Argentina has more credence than other music. Music is universal. But I do respect the creator of this version is the interpreter, who will not stop collecting just because you broadcast an item or two or three on the radio or image. My version of "red ink" is not the version of Fiorentino. And there's a creative right. And so if the disc is spread out.

- What you pay if released outside?

"As long as it is associated is AADI is required.

- And these relations are symmetric?

- They are not. All meetings on intellectual rights are for that. To contribute to knowledge not to close. We are the only ones who go to that meeting, and as we do not pay us one NGO. At least since I entered the house looking for the interpreter to repeat what we have done very few artists: worry about our right. And worry also means taking the opportunity to come to meetings and ask what you want; guide suddenly to a leadership if the leadership was unaware of something. It seems to me. For that I am free-thinking, I'm never with preset codes. And worrying about whether the radios have the lists to be submitted, with names of artists we are to see if they match with what we presume. Because we have to adjust to lists sent to us. And if they send.

- Why do you think that this dissociation occurs in the artists? Because usually the artists you hear the complaint.

-For convenience, you just let me, you do better than me. If we start to see suddenly we see that historically have left the country our rights in the hands of others (for various reasons and circumstances.) When we started talking about our rights, curiously and annoy each other. In the appropriators naturally because we do not we get, and they should bother to bother to defend the right, and who do not distraction, laziness, or simply by skepticism. For various reasons we used to be skeptical. I always say that having lived abroad served me well, but above all I have to wet myself to get some answers to the claims that I can.

- recently seen a change in the interest of the performers?

"Yes, of course. So we continue. At the same time is also what I perceive to belong to an entity that fully supports. I always go to the examples of mine who are the ones I have at hand. Lot of years ago I stood alone in front of the Odeon Theatre, which was the oldest of the city of Buenos Aires to defend the peg. It seemed normal for bus drivers to pass and I shouted: Tana happened to you, are you alone? But the truth is that there was no means to worry of the thing, whether one was actually to fight the thing, and I have to admit that Argentores brought me face. That was a dramatic texts receptacle in which one could say that you could still say. At the same time was aware, Argentores, the theater, building, is the only temple of thought that remains.

- Why?

"Because as you create with freedom, but suddenly you feel that after so and will not be hanged on a coat of folly, is the temple of thought. There are thoughts that come from away, and that noble and authoritative people wrote to us fairly. And there are other authorized people who are the authors, who need the church to act and say and define. All this was capped with a degree exacerbated frivolity. It costs a lot to think together. It costs us. And look, this area of \u200b\u200bthe theater is a nice parking spot. That if there is evil, what is? That is not business, because the owners of this place are people a lot of money. Some of them do not live in the country. We obviously had people next door was louder than one. And they were accustomed to the arrogance, something we get used quickly. Unusual and it costs us say is an example. Y I was used to as Hemingway would say, that Paris was always a party, but on the side of which was a permanent event. Every day someone was expressing something. And the event became an accepted rite, which built on a permanent basis, the dissent in certain things. And earned the causes that are earned. And the whole community accepted this in the whole period of Mitterand. A society like ours that are not used to that kind of challenge every day, critique it, because he always gets involved for evil bothers them. And I was long a person aggrieved. And that's a nuisance has to carry. Not as a karma, it has to take a reality. I'm not upset.

"It's just that sometimes there is interest ...

"I would have liked to have defenses ever have done, is a face to face. It was always through intermediaries powerful who were attacking what they said. And of course there was always upset, and losing. But the best thing that happened was that I was not like losing, I was as alerts. And in any case it is a risky one has. An artist has to have that knowing always risky to lose to win. That's an artist.

"It seems to be quite common.

"Maybe. Some people are rather worried. Sometimes we do not know how to face it, how to do it, but I think it is: I've found with many people really worried and anxious while working for others as for himself. It is a personal adventure of mine.

- Is there a relationship between this attitude toward work and interpretation?

"Yes, of course. Not having double standards. What happens is that not the same represent a nonprofit organization, and say what you say, he believes to be worth listening to (warning time, not undermining), to be saying almost the same but knowing that as it is covered by a large holding, at any time will have to shut up. I speak as I speak because I have no holding back telling me I have to say.

And the public may perceive ...

- Ah, have no doubt! And this is not populism. People are wise. There is a moment where people said this is me saying this but is screwing me. If not would not have the respect I have. All human beings for something, presumably, we are afraid of this or that. I'm a rare bird in this regard. I have never afraid. If I have to speak politically, an anecdote. I will eat my children to a restaurant, and had to wait. Spend a man, and say, oh, how you sing the tango!; You is like no other. Now, on the other hand, you sometimes say things that ... Inevitable, he said. Luckily song tango and forgive me, I say. Then I says to Giustiniani sure not going to vote (referring to the internal Socialist Party), but Rivas was left behind. No, Rivas was nearly killed, my dear, I said. And it is showing the brilliance that is fighting for life from a party that is a device that says the opposite of what it should say. Then the man looked at me, good, not talk. This is what happens. Rivas was nearly killed, in fact the intention was, no doubt. And it is the brilliance that is you can say and report yet. But this man does not like. He likes the device, which he believes to feel protected. I moved everything. When they say Alfonsin he said everything is politics, and I wanted to eat, it's true. I'm talking and I'm doing politics, I'm with a political criterion. But I can not say what I say. That is now "tolerated" rather than an artist can have a political expression as well as singing the tango, you have to cherish. Mix a lot. This man tells me sing the tango. Tango song with a repertoire. That is not the tango that maybe like.

- Is it true that not afraid?

-No. Yes, I am a rarity.

- "Not to loss or degradation of voice?

"No, why?. It is a logical consequence. There is an old physical and you may be deteriorating voice. Today we accept something that is a fact that your voice does not depend only on the vocal cords, but also your whole body. Suddenly I know there is a time when the voice is bark. But if you have things to say, you're going to keep saying the going to continue singing. *